Biodiversity Markets

Speaker Biography: Terry Sunderland

June 19, 2010
By admin

Terry Sunderland is a Senior Scientist with CIFOR’s Forests and Livelihoods Programme, and leads the research domain ‘Managing trade-offs between conservation and development at landscape scale’. Prior to joining CIFOR Terry was based in Central Africa for many years and worked there for the UK’s Department for International Development, University College London, and more recently the Wildlife Conservation Society. He has extensive consultancy experience with various international organizations, including the United States Forest Service, GTZ and the Smithsonian Institution. Terry holds a PhD from University College London.

Posted in Biodiversity Markets, Speaker Bios | Comments Off

Terry Sunderland, from CIFOR’s Forests and Livelihoods Programme, on Integrated Conservation and Development Projects

June 11, 2010
By admin

Terry Sunderland, from CIFOR’s Forests and Livelihoods Programme, is a contributor to the session on Biodiversity Markets and Market Like Mechanisms.

Terry will be presenting a paper on the lessons for REDD from Integrated Conservation and Development Projects (ICDPs).  An abstract of the paper is below:

ICDPs have been a pervasive, although widely criticized, approach to tropical conservation for more than 20 years. More recently, international conservation discourse has shifted away from project-based approaches and towards reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD). While REDD is based upon experience with payment for environmental services (PES) initiatives and forest-related discussions in the United Nations (UN), REDD implementation will still require sub-national projects. Issues of equity will likely pit these sub-national projects against some of the same challenges that have dogged ICDPs. This suggests that REDD project developers stand to learn a great deal from the lessons generated by experience with ICDPs. This paper provides a list of best practices for ICDPs and applies their lessons as principles to guide the development and implementation of sub-national REDD projects. The intent of this approach is to encourage the design and implementation of sub-national REDD projects in a way that avoids the past pitfalls and mistakes, while building upon some successes, of the ICDP conservation approach. By doing so, REDD will be more likely to be implemented in a way that is effective, efficient and equitable.

Posted in Biodiversity Markets | Comments Off

BBOP and Biodiversity Offsets in Vietnam

June 4, 2010
By admin

The following article originally appeared on the Ecosystem Marketplace website.

3 June 2010 | On April 22, 2010, the Government of Vietnam, through the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) and the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment (MONRE) held an initial workshop with the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program (BBOP), a program of Ecosystem Marketplace publisher Forest Trends, to discuss the potential for biodiversity offsets to help Vietnam achieve its conservation and development goals.  Following this initial gathering, the government of Vietnam requested BBOP’s assistance as it further develops policies on biodiversity compensation.  BBOP and MARD have now initiated discussions on the objectives and activities of this collaboration, and are seeking donor support.

Given that biodiversity offsets are still a novel approach in many parts of the world, our Insight Series wanted to delve a bit deeper into BBOP’s approach, Vietnam’s developing biodiversity compensation framework, and what this new partnership hopes to achieve in the next two years

What is a biodiversity offset?

A biodiversity offset is a way to demonstrate that a development (such as a mine or forest plantation) can be implemented in a manner that results in no net loss or a net gain of biodiversity.  BBOP defines biodiversity offsets as “the measurable conservation outcomes of actions designed to compensate for significant residual adverse biodiversity impacts arising from project development after appropriate prevention and mitigation measures have been taken. The goal of biodiversity offsets is to achieve no net loss and preferably a net gain of biodiversity on the ground with respect to species composition, habitat structure, ecosystem function and people’s use and cultural values associated with biodiversity”.

More than 30 countries have laws requiring biodiversity offsets, many others require some form of compensatory conservation, and others still are now exploring policy frameworks for biodiversity offsets.  This is because biodiversity offsets offer a way to achieve better conservation outcomes than typically result from project planning, as developers using a biodiversity offset plan for ‘no net loss’ of biodiversity.  This goes beyond traditional mitigation of impacts, and encourages business to take responsibility for its impacts.  Biodiversity offsets thus result in new and additional investments in conservation outcomes by the private sector, which can help governments achieve the conservation targets they have adopted in national biodiversity strategies and action plans.

Developers are often unsure what is expected of them by government in terms of avoiding, minimizing and ultimately compensating for their impacts on biodiversity.  Clear guidance by government through biodiversity offset policy is welcome as it offers companies legal certainty, efficiency and cost savings in the planning process, and flexibility in how to achieve agreed conservation goals.

What is BBOP?

The Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program is an international partnership of over 50 different company, financial, government, and civil society representatives, who are members of its Advisory Group.  BBOP was established by Forest Trends, an environmental non-profit organization that works globally to support market-based approaches to conservation.  Together, the BBOP members aim to test and develop best practice on biodiversity offsets and conservation banking worldwide.

BBOP’s work is based on real experiences of biodiversity offset design in pilot projects with companies and involves governments which are leaders in the field of biodiversity offsets, often with many years of experience in designing and administering biodiversity offset systems at the national or state level.

One of BBOP’s priorities is to provide technical support and policy advice on biodiversity offsets, landscape-level and regional planning to governments, through general reports and specific advice. BBOP brings experience from around the world to governments which are preparing or reviewing policy related to biodiversity offsets.  This experience comes from different sectors in society, and may include other governments that have developed and administered offset systems, companies that have developed voluntary biodiversity offsets and had experience of complying with offset regulations, financial institutions that include requirements for offsets in their loan conditions, and NGOs that have experience of designing offsets and analyzing offset policies around the world.   BBOP does not speak on behalf of its various constituent members, but gathers and synthesizes lessons from their experiences.

In the absence of a policy requirement for no net loss, the companies BBOP works with are those that will gain the most from undertaking biodiversity offsets.  These are generally companies which have a footprint on biodiversity that represents a business risk for them.  For instance, infrastructure projects, mining, oil and gas, hydropower, wind power, road projects, railways, housing development, tourism and some forms of agriculture.  These companies often find benefits to working with BBOP as governments, financial institutions, and civil society increasingly expect developers to take full responsibility for their biodiversity impacts.  In many cases, biodiversity offsets offer companies a way to demonstrate no net loss of biodiversity, improve outcomes for local communities, and reduce operational and project development risks.
Vietnam’s Biodiversity Law
In Vietnam, a legal framework on biodiversity offsets already exists. Article 75 of the recent Biodiversity Law states that “organizations or individuals that infringe upon conservation areas or biodiversity conservation facilities… shall pay damages in accordance with law”, and that “damage caused to biodiversity due to environmental pollution or degradation shall be compensated in accordance with law”.  In addition, MONRE has just submitted for approval to the Prime Minister a draft national decree on compensation for environmental damages. These pieces of legislation will serve as a foundational framework upon which biodiversity offset policy can be developed in Vietnam.

During the workshop held with MARD and MONRE on April 22, participants agreed that the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program approach can be adopted in Vietnam.
The Next Steps
The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, in the name of the Directorate of Forestry has stated that biodiversity offsets are potentially very useful for Vietnam and requested the technical support of BBOP, which gratefully accepted this opportunity to assist Vietnam balance its development and conservation objectives.  Conclusions from the workshop included the following points:

The Government of Vietnam is interested to learn more from international experiences and the existing knowledge developed by projects within Vietnam to establish suitable policies and support programs that work for government, companies and civil society.
BBOP will assist MARD develop one or more pilot projects in special use forest areas.
BBOP will run a regional or sub-regional training on biodiversity offsets, in order to build Vietnamese capacity in this field of expertise.
BBOP will provide policy and research support to help improve and develop existing Vietnamese policies and supporting legislative arrangements, such as incorporating biodiversity offsets into the Environmental Impact Assessment framework, the Strategic Environmental Assessment, the Biodiversity Law, and/or the Compensation for Environmental Damages framework.

Over the next several months, MARD and BBOP expect to develop a Memorandum of Understanding that will capture shared expectations, roles and responsibilities for this work.  They will develop a workplan for the following two year period that will define activities and objectives, as well as the resources needed to achieve them.

Patrick Maguire is program manager for the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program.  He can be reached at pmaguire (at) forest-trends.org.

Posted in Biodiversity Markets, Resources | Comments Off

Speaker Biography: Kerry ten Kate, Director, BBOP

May 10, 2010
By admin

Kerry Ten Kate is Director of Forest Trends’ Business and Biodiversity Offset Program. Kerry joined the Secretariat of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1990. Subsequently, as Policy Adviser to Kew’s Director, she advised the UK and other governments on the Convention on Biological Diversity and sustainable development strategies. From 1999 to 2002, she was a member of the UK delegation to the negotiation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and negotiating sessions of the CBD. From November 2002 to September 2006, Kerry was Director of Investor Responsibility at Insight Investment. She writes, broadcasts occasionally for BBC Radio 4, is Senior Visiting Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Studies of the UN University, a member of IUCN’s Species Survival Commission and on the Steering Committee of the Global Biodiversity Forum. She is also a member of the UK Government’s Darwin Advisory Committee.

Posted in Biodiversity Markets, Speaker Bios | Comments Off

Video: Biodiversity Markets

April 2, 2010
By admin

Video: Biodiversity Markets.

This section will shortly contain video resources on the session on Biodiversity Markets at Katoomba 17, focused on Payments for Ecosystem Services in Southeast Asia.

If you would like to contribute to this resource please contact ben(dot)metz(at)katoombagroup(dot)org.

Posted in Biodiversity Markets, Video | Comments Off

Panel Resources: Biodiversity Markets

May 2, 2009
By admin

State of the Biodiversity Markets

As more and more governments and businesses consider market-like instruments as tools for biodiversity footprint management, it is increasingly important to understand what is happening, where, and how those tools work. It is also critical to provide reliable information free to the public to enable all market participants to make more informed decisions, learn from the experiences of others, and ultimately allow stable, equitable and effective conservation markets to develop.
Within the broad spectrum of ‘biodiversity markets,’ weaim to provide a succinct answer to the question ‘What is happening in biodiversity offset and compensation programs around the world?’ There are both mature and nascent payment systems for biodiversity compensation around the world.

Each one is a bit different and they often go by different names: biodiversity offsets, mitigation banking, conservation banking, habitat credit trading, fish habitat compensation, BioBanking, complementary remediation, conservation certificates, and many more are based on compliance with regulation while others are done voluntarily for ethical, competitive, or pre-compliance reasons.  But they are all efforts to reduce biodiversity lossand build the cost of biodiversity impacts into economic decisions through markets or marketlike instruments and payments.

Read the full document here

Posted in Biodiversity Markets, Resources | Comments Off